| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1343305724-2809-9-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:28:44 +0200 From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> To: <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> Subject: [PATCH 8/8] Documentation: Add documentation for boost control switch The new acpi-cpufreq driver supports a system global control switch to disable the frequency boosting feature of some (x86) CPUs. Provide documentation about the rationale and the usage. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 12 +++ Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu index 5dab364..1107a2e 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu @@ -176,3 +176,15 @@ Description: Disable L3 cache indices All AMD processors with L3 caches provide this functionality. For details, see BKDGs at http://developer.amd.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx + + +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost +Date: August 2012 +Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> +Description: Processor frequency boosting control + + This switch controls the boost setting for the whole system. + Boosting allows the CPU and the firmware to run at a frequency + beyound it's nominal limit. + More details can be found in Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt + diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0085494 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +Processor boosting control + + - information for users - + +Quick guide for the impatient: +-------------------- +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost +controls the boost setting for the whole system. You can read and write +that file with either "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting allowed). +Reading or writing 1 does not mean that the system is boosting at this +very moment, but only that the CPU _may_ raise the frequency at it's +discretion. +-------------------- + +Introduction +------------- +Some CPUs support a functionality to raise the operating frequency of +some cores in a multi-core package if certain conditions apply, mostly +if the whole chip is not fully utilized and below it's intended thermal +budget. This is done without operating system control by a combination +of hardware and firmware. +On Intel CPUs this is called "Turbo Boost", AMD calls it "Turbo-Core", +in technical documentation "Core performance boost". In Linux we use +the term "boost" for convenience. + +Rationale for disable switch +---------------------------- + +Though the idea is to just give better performance without any user +intervention, sometimes the need arises to disable this functionality. +Most systems offer a switch in the (BIOS) firmware to disable the +functionality at all, but a more fine-grained and dynamic control would +be desirable: +1. While running benchmarks, reproducible results are important. Since + the boosting functionality depends on the load of the whole package, + single thread performance can vary. By explicitly disabling the boost + functionality at least for the benchmark's run-time the system will run + at a fixed frequency and results are reproducible again. +2. To examine the impact of the boosting functionality it is helpful + to do tests with and without boosting. +3. Boosting means overclocking the processor, though under controlled + conditions. By raising the frequency and the voltage the processor + will consume more power than without the boosting, which may be + undesirable for instance for mobile users. Disabling boosting may + save power here, though this depends on the workload. + + +User controlled switch +---------------------- + +To allow the user to toggle the boosting functionality, the acpi-cpufreq +driver exports a sysfs knob to disable it. There is a file: +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost +which can either read "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting enabled). +Reading the file is always supported, even if the processor does not +support boosting. In this case the file will be read-only and always +reads as "0". Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that +file anyway will return EINVAL. + +On supported CPUs one can write either a "0" or a "1" into this file. +This will either disable the boost functionality on all cores in the +whole system (0) or will allow the hardware to boost at will (1). + +Writing a "1" does not explicitly boost the system, but just allows the +CPU (and the firmware) to boost at their discretion. Some implementations +take external factors like the chip's temperature into account, so +boosting once does not necessarily mean that it will occur every time +even using the exact same software setup. + + +AMD legacy cpb switch +--------------------- +The AMD powernow-k8 driver used to support a very similar switch to +disable or enable the "Core Performance Boost" feature of some AMD CPUs. +This switch was instantiated in each CPU's cpufreq directory +(/sys/devices/system/cpu[0-9]*/cpufreq) and was called "cpb". +Though the per CPU existence hints at a more fine grained control, the +actual implementation only supported a system-global switch semantics, +which was simply reflected into each CPU's file. Writing a 0 or 1 into it +would pull the other CPUs to the same state. +For compatibility reasons this file and its behavior is still supported +on AMD CPUs, though it is now protected by a config switch +(X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB). On Intel CPUs this file will never be created, +even with the config option set. +This functionality is considered legacy and will be removed in some future +kernel version. + +More fine grained boosting control +---------------------------------- + +Technically it is possible to switch the boosting functionality at least +on a per package basis, for some CPUs even per core. Currently the driver +does not support it, but this may be implemented in the future. + -- 1.7.4.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists