[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50114D71.9060700@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:00:17 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com, olalilja@...oo.se,
ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] ASoC: codecs: Enable AB8500 CODEC for Device Tree
On 26/07/12 12:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:28:53AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 1 +
>> include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500-codec.h | 6 ++-
>> sound/soc/codecs/ab8500-codec.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Yet again no binding documentation....
RFC. ;)
I'll write the documentation when/if the properties are accepted.
>> {
>> .name = "ab8500-codec",
>> + .of_compatible = "stericsson,ab8500-codec",
>> },
>
> Why are we doing this? The MFD cells are a totally Linux specific
> thing, there's no reason to represent them in the device tree unless
> they're in some way reusable and the "ab8500-codec" name suggests that's
> unlikely. Just put the properties on the parent node and instantiate
> the MFD cell as normal.
>
>> + /* Has a non-standard Vamic been requested? */
>> + if(of_get_property(np, "stericsson,amic1a-bias-vamic2", NULL))
>
> Coding style.
Missing space? Sorry, typo, I'll change.
>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "stericsson,earpeice-cmv", &value)) {
>> + switch (value) {
>> + case 950 :
>> + codec->ear_cmv = EAR_CMV_0_95V;
>> + break;
>> + case 1100 :
>> + codec->ear_cmv = EAR_CMV_1_10V;
>> + break;
>> + case 1270 :
>> + codec->ear_cmv = EAR_CMV_1_27V;
>> + break;
>> + case 1580 :
>> + codec->ear_cmv = EAR_CMV_1_58V;
>> + break;
>> + default :
>> + codec->ear_cmv = EAR_CMV_UNKNOWN;
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unsuitable earpiece voltage found in DT\n");
>
> The platform data code picks a default, can't the DT code do the same?
No, I don't think that it does? The original code returns -EINVAL unless
a value is specified.
The original author is keen to have a clear error message in case users
try to specify non-exact values. I'd rather we fail-out than use
incorrect values which would be a great deal harder for a user to debug.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists