[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501160F5.5050807@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:23:33 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com, olalilja@...oo.se,
ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] ASoC: io: Prevent use of regmap if request fails
On 26/07/12 16:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:51:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> I don't think we want to use regmap at all, but we're forced to by
>> soc-core. How do we over-ride that behavior? By writing some
>> nonsense into codec->control_data?
>
> You should use that for your control data, yes - you're not forced to
> use regmap at all. Like I say we've got a bunch of drivers doing so
> already.
What's my 'control data'? It's not used in the original codec patch.
The old way wants to go:
snd_soc_update_bits() -> snd_soc_read() -> ab8500_codec_read_reg()
When then calls back into the abx500.
So what 'control data' should I be storing in the codec struct?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists