linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 12/13] driver core: firmware loader: use small timeout for cache device firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOvkdCG_cAsCQPuNQB_4BnXq8f=+RnVXH=NS5GNPvQgtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:48:17 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/13] driver core: firmware loader: use small timeout
 for cache device firmware

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:00:12AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Because device_cache_firmwares only cache the firmware which has been
>> loaded sucessfully at leat once, using a small loading timeout should
>
>                         least
>
>> be OK.
>
> Your commit message doesn't explain why exactly we decrease the timeout:

I have explained it. Because the firmware has been loaded successfully at least
once, so it is very probably to not timeout.

> you should probably say that this patch overrides the default 60s
> timeout because we're in pre-suspend/-hibernate mode where we have
> userspace and are able to load the firmware quickly.

No, it is not what I was saying.

Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/