[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120726165112.GA23857@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:51:12 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: triggers: send uevent when changing triggers
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:03:11PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> Just one quick patch for my idea: emitting a uevent in sysfs_create_file().
>
> --
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> index 00012e3..04da869 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> @@ -570,10 +570,14 @@ int sysfs_add_file(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
> const struct attribute *attr,
>
> int sysfs_create_file(struct kobject * kobj, const struct attribute * attr)
> {
> + int err = 0;
> +
> BUG_ON(!kobj || !kobj->sd || !attr);
>
> - return sysfs_add_file(kobj->sd, attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
> + err = sysfs_add_file(kobj->sd, attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
> + kobject_uevent(kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
That's a veritable flood of change events when a new kobject is created,
right? It also created uevents for a device that has not told userspace
that it is even present, which could cause massive confusion, don't you
think?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists