lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4Xqn9b21w1s0BLPwUJ4SeBPQjQOJ=Ar14iQKF1ZWnyHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:23:41 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	imammedo@...hat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ACPI: Update Container hotplug messages

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> Updated Container hotplug log messages with acpi_pr_<level>()
> and pr_<level>().
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/container.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/container.c b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> index 01a986d..643e962 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/container.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int acpi_container_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>
>
>         if (!device) {
> -               printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "device is NULL\n");
> +               pr_err(PREFIX "device is NULL\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }

This whole "if (!device)" check and the printk should be deleted.  If
the ACPI core calls .add() with a null acpi_device pointer, it's a
core bug, and it's better to take the oops and get the backtrace.

>
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void container_notify_cb(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *context)
>         case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>                 /* Fall through */
>         case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> -               printk(KERN_WARNING "Container driver received %s event\n",
> +               pr_warn("Container driver received %s event\n",
>                        (type == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
>                        "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");

This message looks dubious.  Receiving this event should be a normal
occurrence, so the message might be useful for debugging, but doesn't
seem like a KERN_WARNING event for the user.

>
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static void container_notify_cb(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *context)
>
>                 result = container_device_add(&device, handle);
>                 if (result) {
> -                       pr_warn("Failed to add container\n");
> +                       acpi_pr_warn(handle, "Failed to add container\n");
>                         break;
>                 }
>
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ