[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207262216.43665.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:16:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: coupled: fix sleeping while atomic in cpu notifier
On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Colin Cross wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Colin Cross wrote:
> > >> The cpu hotplug notifier gets called in both atomic and non-atomic
> > >> contexts, it is not always safe to lock a mutex. Filter out all events
> > >> except the six necessary ones, which are all sleepable, before taking
> > >> the mutex.
> > >
> > > I wonder what mutual exclusion mechanis we rely on when the mutex is not taken?
> >
> > We don't need any mutual exclusion because the notifier returns immediately.
>
> Don't we need to disable preemption even?
Sorry, scratch that. It returns NOTIFY_OK if we're not going to take the
mutex.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists