[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120726213730.GA2149@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:37:30 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, liuj97@...il.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@...hat.com,
imammedo@...hat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:58:50PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:22 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_<level>(), where <level> is a kernel
> > > message level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging
> > > messages for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations. acpi_pr_<level>()
> > > appends "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages. This
> > > improves diagnostics in hotplug operations since it identifies an
> > > object that caused an issue in a log file.
> > >
> > > acpi_pr_<level>() takes acpi_handle as an argument, which is passed
> > > to ACPI hotplug notify handlers from the ACPICA. Therefore, it is
> > > always available unlike other kernel objects, such as device.
> > >
> > > For example, the statement below
> > > acpi_pr_err(handle, "Device don't exist, dropping EJECT\n");
> > > logs an error message like this at KERN_ERR.
> > > ACPI: \_SB_.SCK4.CPU4: Device don't exist, dropping EJECT
> > >
> > > ACPI drivers can use acpi_pr_<level>() when they need to identify
> > > a target ACPI object in their messages, such as error messages.
> >
> > It's definitely an improvement to have *something* that identifies a
> > device in these messages. But the ACPI namespace path is not really
> > intended to be user-consumable, so I don't think we should expose it
> > indiscriminately. I think we should be using the ACPI device name
> > ("PNP0C02:00") whenever possible. Given the device name, we can get
> > the path from the sysfs "path" file.
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Thanks for reviewing! Yes, ACPI device path is not good for regular
> users to analyze from the info. I also agree with you that device name
> is a better choice when users always diagnose issues by themselves right
> after they performed an operation. However, there are also cases that
> users ask someone to diagnose an issue remotely from the log files, and
> hotplug operations are performed automatically. In such cases, using
> ACPI device name alone is problematic for hotplug operations since a
> device name comes with an instance number that continues to change with
> hot-add/remove operations. Here is one example scenario. Let's say,
> user has automatic load-balancer or power-saving that can trigger
> hundreds of CPU hotplug operations per a day. This user then found that
> there were multiple hotplug errors logged in the past few days, and
> asked an IT guy to look at the error messages. When this user found the
> issue, all device names are gone from sysfs after repeated hotplug
> operations. This IT guy would have no idea if those errors were
> happening on a particular device or not from the error messages since
> their instance numbers continue to change.
I agree that it's useful to be able to debug from the dmesg log
without having to ask a user to collect stuff from /sys. But rather
than including the namespace path in every message, I think it'd be
better to do one dev_info() in the hotplug notify event handler and
include the path there. Subsequent messages can just use dev_info()
without the namespace info.
> > Another possible approach to this is to add a %p extension rather than
> > adding acpi_printk(). Then you could do, e.g., 'printk("%pA ...\n",
> > handle)', and printk could interpolate the namespace path. But I
> > really think there should be very few places where we need the path,
> > so I'm not sure it's worth it.
>
> Address of handle is not very helpful either when someone needs to
> analyze from log files.
Sorry, I should have made this clearer. The %pA would expand to the ACPI
namespace path, so a "dev_info(dev, "new device for %pA\n", dev->handle)"
would produce output like this:
PNP0C01:00: new device for \_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.MBIO
I fiddled with this a while ago; it would look something like this:
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index c3f36d41..201dcdb 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -551,6 +551,29 @@ char *symbol_string(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+#include <acpi/acpi.h>
+
+static noinline_for_stack
+char *acpi_name_string(char *buf, char *end, acpi_handle handle,
+ struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+{
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ u32 type = ACPI_SINGLE_NAME;
+ char *p = buf;
+
+ if (fmt[0] == 'A')
+ type = ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME;
+
+ status = acpi_get_name(handle, type, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ p = string(buf, end, buffer.pointer, spec);
+ kfree(buffer.pointer);
+ return p;
+}
+#endif
+
static noinline_for_stack
char *resource_string(char *buf, char *end, struct resource *res,
struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
@@ -921,6 +944,8 @@ int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
*
* Right now we handle:
*
+ * - 'A' For full ACPI namespace names
+ * - 'a' For single segment ACPI namespace names
* - 'F' For symbolic function descriptor pointers with offset
* - 'f' For simple symbolic function names without offset
* - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers with offset
@@ -982,6 +1007,9 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
}
switch (*fmt) {
+ case 'A':
+ case 'a':
+ return acpi_name_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
case 'F':
case 'f':
ptr = dereference_function_descriptor(ptr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists