[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120726215543.GJ4560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:55:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information
via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:45:52PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Ideally, we will eventually have a representation that can map
> from regulators all the way down to IP blocks. regulator --> voltage
> domain --> power domain --> clock domain --> clocks --> IP block.
Well, often the clock bit is something of a noop - a lot of SoCs can
reparent the IP block clocks between the different clock domains happily
and have core clock domains that are mostly orthogonal to the power
domains. But yes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists