[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120726235651.28a44eb1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:56:51 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No big TTY/serial patch merge for 3.6-rc1
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:28:07 -0700
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:23:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:08:14 -0700
> > Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > tty: Move the handling of the tty release logic
> >
> > Can we lose that one specifically. I've chased down Ian Abbotts problem
> > and replicated it and that is the offending patch not the lock localise
> > (which still needs to be kept out as it depends upon this one)
> >
> > I have it fixed but it's not had enough testing for -rc1 and moving the
> > termios data has enough spectacular hits all drivers fallout for 3.6
>
> Yes, I can go revert it. I'm working on building up a small tty-linus
> branch at the moment for just the "must haves" for 3.6. Right now it's
> just 10 patches listed below. Any objection to me sending these after
> a round trip through linux-next?
All look good to me
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists