linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to several syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120727065630.0a3c5870@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:56:30 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	michael.brantley@...haw.com, hch@...radead.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
	pstaubach@...grid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to
 several syscalls

On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:15:23 +0900
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeff.
> 
> Which testcase(or test method) do I use to know improved point from
> ESTALE error ?
> I want to know before & after using testcase with this patch-set.
> 

It's a bit labor intensive, I'm afraid...

Attached is a cleaned-up copy of the test program that Peter wrote to
test his original patchset. The basic idea is to run this on both the
client and server at the same time so they race against each other. He
was able to run it overnight when testing with his patchset.

With this patchset, that doesn't work since we're only retrying the
lookup and call once. So, what I've been doing is modifying the program
so that it just runs one test at a time, and sniffing traffic to see
whether the lookups and calls are retried after an ESTALE return from
the server.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

View attachment "estale_test.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (15349 bytes)