lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50127B16.5040401@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:27:18 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks on v3.6

On 07/26/2012 01:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 08:10 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> [  215.026612] NMI backtrace for cpu 1
>> [  215.026612] CPU 1
>> [  215.026612] Pid: 2395, comm: pageattr-test Tainted: G        W    3.5.0-sasha-01644-g824681b #267
>> [  215.026612] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8109bd5a>]  [<ffffffff8109bd5a>] native_write_msr_safe+0xa/0x10
>> [  215.026612] RSP: 0018:ffff88001b803f70  EFLAGS: 00000046
>> [  215.026612] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000ef80 RCX: 000000000000080b
>> [  215.026612] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000000080b
>> [  215.026612] RBP: ffff88001b803f70 R08: 00003ffffffff000 R09: ffff880000000000
>> [  215.026612] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>> [  215.026612] R13: ffff880007a98000 R14: ffff88001fc3a4b8 R15: ffff880000000000
>> [  215.026612] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001b800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [  215.026612] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> [  215.026612] CR2: 000000000000000c CR3: 0000000019dcf000 CR4: 00000000000406e0
>> [  215.026612] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> [  215.026612] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> [  215.026612] Process pageattr-test (pid: 2395, threadinfo ffff88000ced0000, task ffff88000d773000)
>> [  215.026612] Stack:
>> [  215.026612]  ffff88001b803f88 ffffffff81095d07 000000000000ef80 ffff88001b803fa8
>> [  215.026612]  ffffffff810901c4 ffff88000ced1db0 0000000000007a98 ffff88000ced1d00
>> [  215.026612]  ffffffff8369c4af ffff88000ced1c78 <EOI>  ffff88000ced1d00 ffffffff8369aeb4
>> [  215.026612] Call Trace:
>> [  215.026612]  <IRQ>
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff81095d07>] native_apic_msr_eoi_write+0x27/0x30
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810901c4>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x34/0xa0
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369c4af>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
>> [  215.026612]  <EOI>
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369aeb4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810a2cb2>] ? lookup_address+0x112/0x170
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810a32ae>] print_split+0x7e/0x200
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810a4300>] pageattr_test+0x80/0x4a0
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8114a2f8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x118/0x140
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff83696cbe>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2ce/0x370
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369aeb4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810a4720>] ? pageattr_test+0x4a0/0x4a0
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff810a473f>] do_pageattr_test+0x1f/0x50
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8110607d>] kthread+0xad/0xc0
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369cdb4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369aeb4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff81105fd0>] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
>> [  215.026612]  [<ffffffff8369cdb0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>> [  215.026612] Code: 00 55 89 f9 48 89 e5 0f 32 45 31 c0 89 c7 48 89 d0 44 89 06 48 c1 e0 20 89 f9 5d 48 09 c8 c3 66 90 55 89 f0 89 f9 48 89 e5 0f 30 <31> c0 5d c3 66 90 55 89 f9 48 89 e5 0f 33 89 c7 48 89 d0 5d 48
> 
> This is immediately after the EOI.  It looks like the timer interrupt is
> stuck somehow.  Can you run kvm_stat and confirm?

Yup, looks like it. kvm_stats is something like this:

 kvm_entry                                142104033  939393
 kvm_exit                                 142104004  939390
 kvm_apic                                  84781115  582714
 kvm_msr                                   84682085  582714
 kvm_apic_accept_irq                       65219959  522263
 kvm_inj_virq                              43173709  291385

With everything else at 0 when it happens.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ