[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1343392734-11805-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:38:48 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, olalilja@...oo.se, ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@...com,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too
If a list of widgets is provided and one of them fails to be added as
a control, the present semantics fail all subsequent widgets. A better
solution would be to only fail that widget, but pursue in attempting
to add the rest of the list.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index eded657..7d9c154 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3095,8 +3095,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_controls(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
dev_err(dapm->dev,
"ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s\n",
widget->name);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
}
widget++;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists