[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120727135029.396efc08bc34e376376d251b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:50:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h between commit 254298c726b9
("perf/x86: Add Intel Nehalem-EX uncore support") from the tip tree and
commit "arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h: make
UNCORE_PMU_HRTIMER_INTERVAL 64-bit" from the akpm tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
index f385189,d85c25d..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@@ -5,7 -5,9 +5,7 @@@
#include "perf_event.h"
#define UNCORE_PMU_NAME_LEN 32
- #define UNCORE_PMU_HRTIMER_INTERVAL (60 * NSEC_PER_SEC)
-#define UNCORE_BOX_HASH_SIZE 8
-
+ #define UNCORE_PMU_HRTIMER_INTERVAL (60LL * NSEC_PER_SEC)
#define UNCORE_FIXED_EVENT 0xff
#define UNCORE_PMC_IDX_MAX_GENERIC 8
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists