[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d33initv.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:03:48 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:38:51 +0800, Asias He <asias@...hat.com> wrote:
> Add 'virtio_blk.use_bio=1' to kernel cmdline or 'modprobe virtio_blk
> use_bio=1' to enable ->make_request_fn() based I/O path.
This patch conflicts with Paolo's Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling
host cache between writeback and writethrough' which is also queued (see
linux-next).
I'm not sure what the correct behavior for bio & cacheflush is, if any.
But as to the patch itself: it's a hack.
1) Leaving the guest's admin to turn on the switch is a terrible choice.
2) The block layer should stop merging and sorting when a device is
fast, not the driver.
3) I pointed out that slow disks have low IOPS, so why is this
conditional? Sure, more guest exits, but it's still a small number
for a slow device.
4) The only case where we want merging is on a slow device when the host
isn't doing it.
Now, despite this, I'm prepared to commit it. But in my mind it's a
hack: we should aim for use_bio to be based on a feature bit fed from
the host, and use the module parameter only if we want to override it.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists