[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5012326F.80702@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:17:19 +0800
From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com, len.brown@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, cl@...ux.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 12/13] memory-hotplug : add node_device_release
At 07/18/2012 06:17 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> When calling unregister_node(), the function shows following message at
> device_release().
>
> Device 'node2' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be
> fixed.
>
> So the patch implements node_device_release()
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/base/node.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/drivers/base/node.c 2012-07-18 18:24:29.191121066 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/base/node.c 2012-07-18 18:25:47.111146983 +0900
> @@ -252,6 +252,12 @@ static inline void hugetlb_register_node
> static inline void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node) {}
> #endif
>
> +static void node_device_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
> +
> + memset(node_dev, 0, sizeof(struct node));
This line is wrong. node_dev->work_struct may be queued in workqueue.
So, it is very dangerous to clear node_dev->work_struct here.
In my test, it will cause kernel panicked.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> +}
>
> /*
> * register_node - Setup a sysfs device for a node.
> @@ -265,6 +271,7 @@ int register_node(struct node *node, int
>
> node->dev.id = num;
> node->dev.bus = &node_subsys;
> + node->dev.release = node_device_release;
> error = device_register(&node->dev);
>
> if (!error){
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists