[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHO5Pa1OBiLd5oEQ_9-7YrK5W-aD3bd1PwCS4TcAVDP3a7PWcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:07:25 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:46 PM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> 3. HEADER COMMENTS NOT RETAINED IN KAPI FILES
>> >
>> > How about the attached changes? This is a delta to the disintegrate markers
>> > diff I sent earlier.
>>
>> That looks about right to me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
>
> Excellent, thanks. The question is where can I attach your ack? I'm not
> going to simply tag these on the end as a new patch, but rather the changes
> are included in the regenerated patches as I changed the scripts.
>
> So just the main set of scripted commits?
Modulo the following statements:
* The conceptual approach of your scripts makes sense to me.
* I checked a significant, but far from complete, sample of the output
files, and the results look correct.
* My comparator scripts support the belief that no content is being
lost in the resulting header files (once you've made the changes noted
yesterday).
then you could add my Acked-by: for the commits generated by the scripts.
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer;
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface", http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists