[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <971756309.4742543.1343457753475.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
> > I'm not sure what the correct behavior for bio & cacheflush is, if
> > any.
>
> REQ_FLUSH is not supported in the bio path.
Ouch, that's correct:
@@ -414,7 +529,7 @@ static void virtblk_update_cache_mode(struct virtio_device *vdev)
u8 writeback = virtblk_get_cache_mode(vdev);
struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
- if (writeback)
+ if (writeback && !use_bio)
blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, REQ_FLUSH);
else
blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, 0);
then it is not safe against power losses.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists