linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1343653256.1513.6.camel@kyv>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:00:56 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 09:16 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:40:53 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
> > I've also amended the Kconfig text a tiny bit and dropped the defconfig
> > changes - let's have them separately as a single patch at the end of the
> > series.
> 
> Wouldn't having the defconfig change as the last patch break things for
> those defconfigs that had explicitly set CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE
> other than the default?

OK, fair enough, but let's have it as a 2 separate patches anyway. It is
not a big deal to first change the defconfig, and then actually add the
new option.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)