[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120730134247.GA6041@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:42:47 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:25:51AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> I consider this approach a half-way step. Quick attempts on my laptop
> and I couldn't find a case where the bio path was a loss, but in theory
> if the host wasn't doing any reordering and it was a slow device, you'd
> want the guest to do so.
>
> I'm not sure if current qemu can be configured to do such a thing?
The host kernel will do the I/O scheduling for you unless you explicitly
disable it. And we should be able to assume an administrator will only
disable it when they have a reason for it - if not they'll get worse
performance for non-virtualized workloads as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists