[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-665605a2a207dbe1fa429b474f932d6ea138ba92@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:13:11 -0700
From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Uprobe_mmap/
munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe()
Commit-ID: 665605a2a207dbe1fa429b474f932d6ea138ba92
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/665605a2a207dbe1fa429b474f932d6ea138ba92
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:22:29 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:27:20 +0200
uprobes: Uprobe_mmap/munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe()
The bug was introduced by me in 449d0d7c ("uprobes: Simplify the
usage of uprobe->pending_list").
Yes, we do not care about uprobe->pending_list after return and
nobody can remove the current list entry, but put_uprobe(uprobe)
can actually free it and thus we need list_for_each_safe().
Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120729182229.GA20329@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 5db150b..bed2161 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct list_head tmp_list;
- struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
struct inode *inode;
int ret, count;
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
ret = 0;
count = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
if (!ret) {
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
struct list_head tmp_list;
- struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
struct inode *inode;
if (!atomic_read(&uprobe_events) || !valid_vma(vma, false))
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
- list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists