[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120730153731.GA28633@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:37:31 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [ 39/40] cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier
related damage v3
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
> write_seqcount_{begin,end} on set_mems_allowed for the case with
> CONFIG_CPUSETS, like in the original patch:
>
> static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
> {
> task_lock(current);
> + write_seqcount_begin(¤t->mems_allowed_seq);
> current->mems_allowed = nodemask;
> + write_seqcount_end(¤t->mems_allowed_seq);
> task_unlock(current);
> }
>
Ok, but that's not in a patch format that I can apply :(
Care to redo it so I can add it to the existing patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists