[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120730154706.GL4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:47:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 07:05 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > + power-on-sequence {
> > + regulator@0 {
> > + id = "power";
> > + enable;
> What do this mean? Isn't this implied for a regulator?
I assume you might have some sequences which need some things to be
turned off for some reason; it at least seems to be something you'd want
to design for.
> This looks like you designed the platform_data structs first and then
> came up with device nodes to mirror the struct.
Judging by most of the DT I review this seems idiomatic :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists