linux-kernel - Re: [2/3][PATCH][v2] TDM Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120730160146.GB28703@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:01:46 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Singh Sandeep-B37400 <B37400@...escale.com>
Cc:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"galak@...nel.crashing.org" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2/3][PATCH][v2] TDM Framework

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +0000, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
> 1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the framework
>    is pretty useless.
> [Sandeep] We do have a test client but not good enough to be pushed in
> open source, should we add it to documentation?? 

Then how do you know if the framework is "correct" and good enough for
real clients?  We don't add frameworks, or apis, to the kernel without
users, so you will have to come up with some users before we can accept
it.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/