[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5016C5EF.7060707@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:35:43 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ville Syrjala <syrjala@....fi>,
GregKH <greh@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] onewire: w1-gpio: add ext_pullup_enable pin in platform
data
On 30.07.2012 19:32, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for long delay
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Daniel Mack (zonque@...il.com) wrote:
>> In the process of porting boards to devicetree implemenation, we should
>> keep information about external circuitry where they belong - the
>> individual drivers.
>>
>> This patch adds a way to specify a GPIO to drive the (optional) external
>> pull-up logic, rather than using a function pointer for that.
>
> I do not object against this patch, but I have rather limited knowledge
> about gpio driver.
The first patch just offers a new way to drive an optional external
pull-up and as nobody uses that feature currently, there can't be any
breakage.
And the second patch doesn't change any functional behaviour of the
driver, it simply offers a new way to instanciate it.
> Patch looks good, feel free to add my
> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Thanks!
>
> Greg, please pull it into your tree, if Ville does not object.
> Thank you.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists