[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501619A4.50906@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:50:36 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
CC: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Venkatraman S <svenkatr@...com>,
Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC/omap_hsmmc: handle failure of regulator_get better.
On Monday 30 July 2012 05:42 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> 1/ if regulator_get fails, return an error. This is important
> if it failed with EPROBE_DEFER, as the probe needs to be
> deferred.
>
> 2/ Don't set .set_power until the regulator has been found, or
> the deferred probe will not bother calling omap_hsmmc_reg_get().
I am not very sure, but aren't the data structures re-allocated on a
re-probe (after it was deferred) causing .set_power to be lost anyway?
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown<neilb@...e.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index 389a3ee..f052c29 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -299,12 +299,12 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
> struct regulator *reg;
> int ocr_value = 0;
>
> - mmc_slot(host).set_power = omap_hsmmc_set_power;
> -
> reg = regulator_get(host->dev, "vmmc");
> if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> dev_dbg(host->dev, "vmmc regulator missing\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(reg);
> } else {
> + mmc_slot(host).set_power = omap_hsmmc_set_power;
> host->vcc = reg;
> ocr_value = mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask(reg);
> if (!mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists