lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANfBPZ_9XOjgeeRk8zrNWHH1VgevXu74P4bYGcRBSVj7Rs6GEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:49:08 +0530
From:	"S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@...com>
To:	Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	raphael.andy.lee@...il.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] mmc: core: Remove bounce buffer in mmc_send_cxd_data()

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com> wrote:
> It is expected that Extended CSD register(the size of this register
> is larger than CID/CSD) will be referenced more frequently as more
> fields have been added to Extended CSD and it seems that it is not
> a good option to double the memory used.
>
> This patch is intended to avoid the use of bounce buffer for reading
> Extended CSD register in mmc_send_cxd_data().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Handling on-stack buffer if it's used in caller.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove unnecesary code.
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index 0ed2cc5..036e6d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -239,13 +239,19 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,
>         struct mmc_data data = {0};
>         struct scatterlist sg;
>         void *data_buf;
> +       int is_on_stack;
>
> -       /* dma onto stack is unsafe/nonportable, but callers to this
> -        * routine normally provide temporary on-stack buffers ...
> -        */
> -       data_buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (data_buf == NULL)
> -               return -ENOMEM;
> +       is_on_stack = object_is_on_stack(buf);
> +       if (is_on_stack) {
> +
> +               /* dma onto stack is unsafe/nonportable, but callers to this
> +                * routine normally provide temporary on-stack buffers ...
> +                */
> +               data_buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (data_buf == NULL)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +       } else
> +               data_buf = buf;
>
>         mrq.cmd = &cmd;
>         mrq.data = &data;
> @@ -280,8 +286,10 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,
>
>         mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);
>
> -       memcpy(buf, data_buf, len);
> -       kfree(data_buf);
> +       if (is_on_stack) {
> +               memcpy(buf, data_buf, len);
> +               kfree(data_buf);
> +       }
>
>         if (cmd.error)
>                 return cmd.error;
> @@ -294,24 +302,34 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,
>  int mmc_send_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *csd)
>  {
>         int ret, i;
> +       u32 *csd_tmp;
>
>         if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host))
>                 return mmc_send_cxd_native(card->host, card->rca << 16,
>                                 csd, MMC_SEND_CSD);
>
> -       ret = mmc_send_cxd_data(card, card->host, MMC_SEND_CSD, csd, 16);
> +       csd_tmp = kmalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!csd_tmp)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ret = mmc_send_cxd_data(card, card->host, MMC_SEND_CSD, csd_tmp, 16);
>         if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> +               goto err;
> +
> +       memcpy(csd, csd_tmp, 16);
Can this memcpy be folded into the for loop below
as for (....) { csd[i] = be32_to_cpu(csd_tmp[i]); ?

>
>         for (i = 0;i < 4;i++)
>                 csd[i] = be32_to_cpu(csd[i]);
>
> -       return 0;
> +err:
> +       kfree(csd_tmp);
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  int mmc_send_cid(struct mmc_host *host, u32 *cid)
>  {
>         int ret, i;
> +       u32 *cid_tmp;
>
>         if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
>                 if (!host->card)
> @@ -320,14 +338,22 @@ int mmc_send_cid(struct mmc_host *host, u32 *cid)
>                                 cid, MMC_SEND_CID);
>         }
>
> -       ret = mmc_send_cxd_data(NULL, host, MMC_SEND_CID, cid, 16);
> +       cid_tmp = kmalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!cid_tmp)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ret = mmc_send_cxd_data(NULL, host, MMC_SEND_CID, cid_tmp, 16);
>         if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> +               goto err;
> +
> +       memcpy(cid, cid_tmp, 16);
>
<Same comment as above>

>         for (i = 0;i < 4;i++)
>                 cid[i] = be32_to_cpu(cid[i]);
>
> -       return 0;
> +err:
> +       kfree(cid_tmp);
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  int mmc_send_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ