[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5017D4AB.3090107@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:50:51 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Testing tracer wakeup_rt: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 07/31/2012 03:17 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >
>> > It's good to quickly get to the root cause :) Can we possibly detect
>> > whether we are in a virtual machine and hence skip this particular
>> > test case?
>>
>> cpu_has(&boot_cpu, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)
>>
>
> Yeah, but then it is still broken on non-x86 code (the test lives in
> core kernel).
>
> As it is just testing the events for wakeup, I could probably just add a
> completion and force the other thread to just wait for it. I'll write up
> a patch. But it wont make it in till 3.7.
That would be better. A hypervisor might be real-time capable (with
some effort kvm can do this), so we don't want to turn off real time
features just based on that.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists