[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120731143600.GD27834@fieldses.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:36:00 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 3.6
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:29:48AM -0400, bfields wrote:
> Please pull nfsd (and some lockd and a couple locks/lease) changes from:
By the way, for a few years now I've been semi-regularly picking up
locks.c changes for my tree. I wonder if I should be.
At the least we should probably remove this entry from MAINTAINERS? And
by default I suppose that stuff reverts to Al, who rumor has it will
have a fair number of locks.c patches next time around.
Or I'm happy to claim to be maintainer of that file if somebody prefers,
it doesn't matter much to me.
--b.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3e30a3a..305ac2c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2767,15 +2767,6 @@ F: include/scsi/fc/
F: include/scsi/libfc.h
F: include/scsi/libfcoe.h
-FILE LOCKING (flock() and fcntl()/lockf())
-M: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
-L: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
-S: Maintained
-F: include/linux/fcntl.h
-F: include/linux/fs.h
-F: fs/fcntl.c
-F: fs/locks.c
-
FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)
M: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
L: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists