[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120731161916.GA4941@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:19:16 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] promote zcache from staging
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> So in my head I feel that it is Ok to:
> 1) address the concerns that zcache has before it is unstaged
> 2) rip out the two-engine system with a one-engine system
> (and see how well it behaves)
> 3) sysfs->debugfs as needed
> 4) other things as needed
>
> I think we are getting hung-up what Greg said about adding features
> and the two-engine->one engine could be understood as that.
> While I think that is part of a staging effort to clean up the
> existing issues. Lets see what Greg thinks.
Greg has no idea, except I want to see the needed fixups happen before
new features get added. Add the new features _after_ it is out of
staging.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists