[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120731221113.GA10201@liondog.tnic>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 00:11:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: awful kconfig help texts.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:43:13PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:07:41PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Oh, there's one more enlightening sentence in the help:
> >
> > "You only need to enable this, if you also want to enable one or more of
> > the PWM drivers below."
> >
> > Got it? :-)
>
> No, it doesn't add anything useful at all.
Sorry, I think you misunderstood me and I didn't express my irony
adequately - I was trying to be ironic, maybe even sarcastic here. But
that's hard to convey in written form.
> I know PWM is probably pulse width modulation, but why would my kernel
> need to care about this ? Why would I need drivers for it ?
>
> Also, think about what happens with 'oldconfig'. You don't get to even
> see 'the drivers below' until you've answered this question.
>
> It couldn't be more opaque if it tried.
I agree with all you've said and you're preaching to the choir. Sorry
that I didn't make my sarcasm more explicit.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists