[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120801104237.GB7227@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:42:37 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/24] arm: initial Xen support
> > > +struct pvclock_wall_clock {
> > > + u32 version;
> > > + u32 sec;
> > > + u32 nsec;
> > > +} __attribute__((__packed__));
> >
> > That is weird. It is 4+4+4 = 12 bytes? Don't you want it to be 16 bytes?
>
> I agree that 16 bytes would be a better choice, but it needs to match
> the struct in Xen that is defined as follow:
>
> uint32_t wc_version; /* Version counter: see vcpu_time_info_t. */
> uint32_t wc_sec; /* Secs 00:00:00 UTC, Jan 1, 1970. */
> uint32_t wc_nsec; /* Nsecs 00:00:00 UTC, Jan 1, 1970. */
Would it make sense to add some paddigin then at least? In both
cases? Or is it too late for this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists