[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98D21DD6-3BDE-402D-8DC1-0AAD79502B8F@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 02:18:45 +0000
From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Jianbin Kang <kjbmail@...il.com>
CC: "Mason, Jon" <jon.mason@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support
On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:10 PM, "Jianbin Kang" <kjbmail@...il.com> wrote:
>> Actually this is what I'm working on now, using async_tx to replace the
>> memcpy. I believe the changes shouldn't be that significant.
>>
>> Is the "hardware that can setup dma" you refer to something that does
>> not use this interface?
>>
>
> Yes, they use this interface, but split 'memcpy_toio' to two operation:
> 1. setup dma
> 2. wait/poll for the dma to finish.
> So maybe it need to provide a generic function 'tx' for different hardwares.
>
It's not worth it to do sync DMA. The performance is terrible.
> If async_tx is available, it's much better than this 'sync dma/memcpy'.
> One problem with async_tx is, it can't detect memcpy error.
> If the remote ntb goes down when async_memcpy is in operation, async_tx
> will trigger an oops.
Yes that is something that needs to be addressed when we get async DMA support working. --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists