linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/24] xen: update xen_add_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:18:29 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/24] xen: update xen_add_to_physmap interface

On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:34:02PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Update struct xen_add_to_physmap to be in sync with Xen's version of the
> > structure.
> > The size field was introduced by:
> > 
> > changeset:   24164:707d27fe03e7
> > user:        Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@...citrix.com>
> > date:        Fri Nov 18 13:42:08 2011 +0000
> > summary:     mm: New XENMEM space, XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range
> > 
> > According to the comment:
> > 
> > "This new field .size is located in the 16 bits padding between .domid
> > and .space in struct xen_add_to_physmap to stay compatible with older
> > versions."
> > 
> > This is not true on ARM where there is not padding, but it is valid on
> > X86, so introducing size is safe on X86 and it is going to fix the
> > interace for ARM.
> 
> Has this been checked actually for backwards compatibility? It sounds
> like it should work just fine with Xen 4.0 right?
> 
> I believe this also helps Mukesh's patches, so CC-ing him here for
> his Ack.
> 
> I can put this in right now in tree if we are 100% sure its compatiblie with 4.0.

Yes, it is: 4 bytes integers are 4-byte aligned on 32 bit and 64 bit
on x86.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/