| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <003f01cd6fa2$36463bd0$a2d2b370$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:57:54 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Sachin Kamat' <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Cc: 'Damien Cassou' <damien.cassou@...l.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
'Florian Tobias Schandinat' <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c: use devm_
functions
On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 1:38 PM Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> On 1 August 2012 10:00, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 1:00 PMSachin Kamat wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1 August 2012 04:51, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 1:39 AM Damien Cassou wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> From: Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@...l.fr>
> >> >>
> >> >> The various devm_ functions allocate memory that is released when a driver
> >> >> detaches. This patch uses these functions for data that is allocated in
> >> >> the probe function of a platform device and is only freed in the remove
> >> >> function.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@...l.fr>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 27 +++++++--------------------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> >> index c6c016a..00fe4f0 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> >> @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static int __devinit exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >>
> >> >> dp->dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> >>
> >> >> - dp->clock = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "dp");
> >> >> + dp->clock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "dp");
> >> >> if (IS_ERR(dp->clock)) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n");
> >> >> return PTR_ERR(dp->clock);
> >> >> @@ -881,31 +881,24 @@ static int __devinit exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> clk_enable(dp->clock);
> >> >>
> >> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> >> - if (!res) {
> >> >> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get registers\n");
> >> >> - ret = -EINVAL;
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> - }
> >> >
> >> > Why do you remove this return check?
> >> > If there is no reason, please, do it as follows:
> >> >
> >> > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> > if (!res) {
> >> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get registers\n");
> >> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> >> > - goto err_clock;
> >> > + return -EINVAL;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> devm_request_and_ioremap function checks the validity of res. Hence
> >> this check above is redundant and can be removed.
> >
> >
> > I don't think so.
> > Even though function called next checks the NULL value,
> > for robustness, the return value of platform_get_resource() should be
> > checked.
> >
> > It is possible that devm_request_and_ioremap() can be changed in the future,
> > as request_mem_region() & ioremap() were changed to devm_request_and_ioremap().
>
> They are not changed. They still exist. devm_request_and_ioremap() is
> an additional function provided for device managed resources.
OK, I see. I accept it.
Anyway it is simpler.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jingoo Han
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Damien,
> >> This patch only adds devm_clk_get() function. Hence you could make the
> >> subject line more specific.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Jingoo Han
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> dp->reg_base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> >> >> if (!dp->reg_base) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap\n");
> >> >> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> dp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >> >> if (!dp->irq) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
> >> >> - ret = -ENODEV;
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dp->irq, exynos_dp_irq_handler, 0,
> >> >> "exynos-dp", dp);
> >> >> if (ret) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> dp->video_info = pdata->video_info;
> >> >> @@ -917,7 +910,7 @@ static int __devinit exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> ret = exynos_dp_detect_hpd(dp);
> >> >> if (ret) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to detect hpd\n");
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> exynos_dp_handle_edid(dp);
> >> >> @@ -926,7 +919,7 @@ static int __devinit exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> dp->video_info->link_rate);
> >> >> if (ret) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to do link train\n");
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> exynos_dp_enable_scramble(dp, 1);
> >> >> @@ -940,17 +933,12 @@ static int __devinit exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> ret = exynos_dp_config_video(dp, dp->video_info);
> >> >> if (ret) {
> >> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to config video\n");
> >> >> - goto err_clock;
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dp);
> >> >>
> >> >> return 0;
> >> >> -
> >> >> -err_clock:
> >> >> - clk_put(dp->clock);
> >> >> -
> >> >> - return ret;
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> static int __devexit exynos_dp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> @@ -962,7 +950,6 @@ static int __devexit exynos_dp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> pdata->phy_exit();
> >> >>
> >> >> clk_disable(dp->clock);
> >> >> - clk_put(dp->clock);
> >> >>
> >> >> return 0;
> >> >> }
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> With warm regards,
> >> Sachin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With warm regards,
> Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists