[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501A766C.1060502@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:45:32 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
olalilja@...oo.se, ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...com,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] Documentation: Define the MSP Driver Device Tree
bindings
On 31/07/12 16:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 31/07/12 14:55, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>>> +Optional properties:
>>>> + - interrupts : The interrupt outputs from the device.
>
>>> If there's more than one interrupt then how are they ordered?
>
>> It doesn't matter. If there are any more than one (which there
>> aren't in this case), we usually use the interrupt-names property
>> then request them by name in the driver.
>
> So the binding therefore needs to say "The interrupt output from the
> device" as there's only one output supported. If we were using
> interrupt-names then we'd need to document what the supported names are.
Okay, I've changed 'outputs' to 'output'.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists