linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120802135350.GA18084@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:53:50 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown
 of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)

On Thu 02-08-12 14:33:10, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 02-08-12 08:37:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:19:34AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > On the other hand, mine is more coupled with the sharing code so it
> > > > makes the code easier to follow and also makes the sharing more
> > > > effective because racing processes see pmd populated when checking for
> > > > shareable mappings.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It could do with a small comment above huge_pmd_share() explaining that
> > > calling pmd_alloc() under the i_mmap_mutex is necessary to prevent two
> > > parallel faults missing a sharing opportunity with each other but it's
> > > not mandatory.
> > 
> > Sure, that's a good idea. What about the following:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > index 40b2500..51839d1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,13 @@ static int vma_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > - * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb.
> > + * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb. In any case calls
> > + * pmd_alloc and returns the corresponding pte. While this not necessary
> > + * for the !shared pmd case because we can allocate the pmd later as
> > + * well it makes the code much cleaner. pmd allocation is essential for
> > + * the shared case though because pud has to be populated inside the
> > + * same i_mmap_mutex section otherwise racing tasks could either miss
> > + * the sharing (see huge_pte_offset) or selected a bad pmd for sharing.
> >   */
> >  static pte_t*
> >  huge_pmd_share(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pud_t *pud)
> > 
> 
> Looks reasonable to me.

OK, added to the patch. I will send it to Andrew now.

Thanks a lot!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/