[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343916747.25013.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:12:27 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de,
thomas.wucher@...utronix.de, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, tim.bird@...sony.com, Marius.Mazarel@...l.ro,
nyoushchenko@...sta.com
Subject: Re: UBI fastmap updates
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 14:18 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This is the next round of UBI fastmap updates.
> It fixes all issues pointed out by Shmulik. :-)
I see the following errors when rung UBI tests on nandsim:
[ 3698.041511] UBI error: __wl_get_peb: no free eraseblocks
[ 3698.041781] UBI error: ubi_wl_get_fm_peb: no free eraseblocks
[ 3714.773064] UBI error: __wl_get_peb: no free eraseblocks
[ 3714.773336] UBI error: ubi_wl_get_fm_peb: no free eraseblocks
How can this happen? I do not have any bad blocks.
If I understand correctly, it can be only because of a bug. If I am
correct, could you please add a 'dump_stack()' to improve the error
report?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists