linux-kernel - Re: [next:akpm 129/309] net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer element is not constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120802150209.GA26601@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:02:09 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...isc-linux.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [next:akpm 129/309] net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer
 element is not constant

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> >> Here is the line in sock.i:
> >>
> >> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled =
> >> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) });
> >
> > The above line contains two compound literals.  It also uses a designated
> > initializer to initialize the field enabled.  A compound literal is not a
> > constant expression.
> 
> Seeing the same thing on ia64 building next-20120726.  Same fix works
> for me ... so I'll steal this whole changelog and attributes.

I got the same error for alpha, the same fix applies.
---
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] [ALPHA] Redefine ATOMIC_INIT and ATOMIC64_INIT to drop the casts

The following build error occurred during an alpha build:

net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer element is not constant

Dave Anglin says:
> Here is the line in sock.i:
>
> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled =
> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) });

The above line contains two compound literals.  It also uses a designated
initializer to initialize the field enabled.  A compound literal is not a
constant expression.

The location of the above statement isn't fully clear, but if a compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the initializer list must
consist of constant expressions.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
 arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h	2012-05-24 19:03:06.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h	2012-08-02 23:01:02.243224220 +0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
  */
 
 
-#define ATOMIC_INIT(i)		( (atomic_t) { (i) } )
-#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i)	( (atomic64_t) { (i) } )
+#define ATOMIC_INIT(i)		( { (i) } )
+#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i)	( { (i) } )
 
 #define atomic_read(v)		(*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter)
 #define atomic64_read(v)	(*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/