[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fw851c3d.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:40:38 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> writes:
> Heh, I've started working on it in April, and just returned to this. Didn't think about rebasing to something new.
>
> will fix - Thanks!
You might want to look at some of the work that Eric Dumazet has done in
the networking stack with rcu hashtables that can be resized.
For a trivial hash table I don't know if the abstraction is worth it.
For a hash table that starts off small and grows as big as you need it
the incent to use a hash table abstraction seems a lot stronger.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists