[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14936868.DMgLzkV3C3@bentobox>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:44:57 +0200
From: Schrober <franzschrober@...oo.de>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add control statement test to SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO
On Thursday 02 August 2012 17:23:22 Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 913d6bd..ca05ba2 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -3016,7 +3016,8 @@ sub process {
> >
> > $herectx .= raw_line($linenr, $n) . "\n";
> >
> > }
> >
> > - if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1) {
> > + if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1 &&
> > + $stmts !~ /^\s*(if|while|for|switch)\b/) {
> >
> > WARN("SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO",
> >
> > "Single statement macros should not use a do {} while
(0)
> > loop\n" . "$herectx");>
> > }
>
> Looks reasonable enough.
>
> Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Works well for me, thanks
Just as note: I think this test was accidently added twice. Once in commit
b13edf7ff2dd0fef95e981170fa71fa6b60421b0 and one time in
7d64ef43914a734990e48a80bc60686c8db21946 (just checked linux-next, and Stephen
added it again). Maybe Andrew Morton's tree is out of sync.
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists