[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120802055839.GA12241@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 07:58:39 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/32] PCI/ARM: use PCIe capabilities access functions
to simplify implementation
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:20:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> >
> > Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>
> This is probably fine from my perspective assuming the underlying PCI
> API implementation is OKd by relevant people.
>
> Thierry, can you comment on whether this will conflict with your Tegra
> PCIe driver series? If it doesn't, this patch can go through any
> relevant PCI tree. If it does, we may have to take this through the
> Tegra tree after merging the dependencies, or defer it to later.
I haven't touched those lines. tegra_pcie_relax_enable() only uses
generic PCI functions so I don't expect any conflicts. git blame
confirms that those lines haven't been changed in about 2 years.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists