[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208022209.16015.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 22:09:15 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@....net>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface)
On Monday, July 30, 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
> > the aim is to select a PNP ACPI option where resources can be disabled
> > (or are not needed). E.g., the parallel port of the 600E can be used
> > with and without IRQ lines. The means to allow for this is to use the
> > sysfs interface to select disabled resources (just like any other
> > resource value). In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/3/41, I used the
> > following example:
> >
> > echo disable > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources
> > echo clear > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources
> > echo set irq disabled > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources
> > echo fill > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources
> > echo activate > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources
> >
> > The third line is made possible by the patch series. All other
> > lines are already implemented.
>
> Shouldn't this be rather "disable_irq" or something which is a single
> word and thus would simplify parsing a lot?
Or just "irq", which isn't going to be confused with anything else it seems.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists