[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120802062742.GA23573@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:27:42 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/4] virtio-blk: Add REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support
to bio path
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:25:56PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> We need to support both REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA for bio based path since
> it does not get the sequencing of REQ_FUA into REQ_FLUSH that request
> based drivers can request.
>
> REQ_FLUSH is emulated by:
> 1. Send VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH to device
> 2. Wait until the flush is finished
There is no need to wait for the flush to finish if the REQ_FLUSH
request has no data payload.
Even if it has a payload waiting is highly suboptimal and it should
use a non-blocking sequencing like it is done in the request layer.
>
> REQ_FUA is emulated by:
> 1. Send the actual write
> 2. Wait until the actual write is finished
> 3. Send VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH to device
> 4. Wait until the flush is finished
> 5. Signal the end of the write to upper layer
The same comment about not blocking applies here as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists