[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120803173830.GA22687@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:38:30 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: fix
set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic
On 08/03, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2012 06:29 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
>> index afa60db..636402e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
>> @@ -166,12 +166,18 @@ static void set_task_blockstep(struct task_struct *task, bool on)
>> else
>> clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
>>
>> + if (task != current)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* ensure irq/preemption can't change debugctl in between */
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
>> if (on)
>> debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
>> else
>> debugctl&= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
>> update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
>> + local_irq_enable();
>
> wouldn't preempt_disable() be enough?
preempt_disable() can't help if interrupt handler changes
other bits in between?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists