[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501C1953.8020807@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:32:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86, CPU: Extend TLB size detection for AMD
On 08/03/2012 09:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
>
> TLB characteristics on AMD are in the extended CPUID level, leafs
> 0x8000000{5,6} so we need to check those before doing the detection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index d239977f361f..ebab0e77e691 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -940,7 +940,8 @@ void __init identify_boot_cpu(void)
> #else
> vgetcpu_set_mode();
> #endif
> - if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 2)
> + if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 2 ||
> + boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000006)
> cpu_detect_tlb(&boot_cpu_data);
> }
>
This really belongs in cpu_detect_tlb() itself (or rather, in the
subfunctions called by it.) Can we just lose the general test here, please?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists