| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1344023177-21167-3-git-send-email-pavan_savoy@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:46:13 -0500
From: <pavan_savoy@...com>
To: <gregkh@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <pavan_savoy@...y.com>, Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] drivers/misc/ti-st: remove sparse warnings
From: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@...com>
remove sparse warnings by assigning right storage specifiers to functions and
also clean-up the declarations in the include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
Change-Id: I459a8faf759339c63ec9497d28651d64ccfea534
Signed-off-by: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@...com>
---
drivers/misc/ti-st/st_core.c | 12 +++++++-----
drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c | 12 ++++++------
include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_core.c b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_core.c
index acfaeeb..46937b1 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_core.c
@@ -30,11 +30,13 @@
#include <linux/ti_wilink_st.h>
+extern void st_kim_recv(void *, const unsigned char *, long);
+void st_int_recv(void *, const unsigned char *, long);
/* function pointer pointing to either,
* st_kim_recv during registration to receive fw download responses
* st_int_recv after registration to receive proto stack responses
*/
-void (*st_recv) (void*, const unsigned char*, long);
+static void (*st_recv) (void *, const unsigned char *, long);
/********************************************************************/
static void add_channel_to_table(struct st_data_s *st_gdata,
@@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ int st_int_write(struct st_data_s *st_gdata,
* push the skb received to relevant
* protocol stacks
*/
-void st_send_frame(unsigned char chnl_id, struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
+static void st_send_frame(unsigned char chnl_id, struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
{
pr_debug(" %s(prot:%d) ", __func__, chnl_id);
@@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ void st_send_frame(unsigned char chnl_id, struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
* This function is being called with spin lock held, protocol drivers are
* only expected to complete their waits and do nothing more than that.
*/
-void st_reg_complete(struct st_data_s *st_gdata, char err)
+static void st_reg_complete(struct st_data_s *st_gdata, char err)
{
unsigned char i = 0;
pr_info(" %s ", __func__);
@@ -379,7 +381,7 @@ done:
* completely, return that skb which has the pending data.
* In normal cases, return top of txq.
*/
-struct sk_buff *st_int_dequeue(struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
+static struct sk_buff *st_int_dequeue(struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
{
struct sk_buff *returning_skb;
@@ -401,7 +403,7 @@ struct sk_buff *st_int_dequeue(struct st_data_s *st_gdata)
* txq and waitq needs protection since the other contexts
* may be sending data, waking up chip.
*/
-void st_int_enqueue(struct st_data_s *st_gdata, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static void st_int_enqueue(struct st_data_s *st_gdata, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
unsigned long flags = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c
index 5c99995..847406a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct platform_device *st_get_plat_device(int id)
* in case of error don't complete so that waiting for proper
* response times out
*/
-void validate_firmware_response(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata)
+static void validate_firmware_response(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = kim_gdata->rx_skb;
if (unlikely(skb->data[5] != 0)) {
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static inline int kim_check_data_len(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata, int len)
* have been observed to come in bursts of different
* tty_receive and hence the logic
*/
-void kim_int_recv(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata,
+static void kim_int_recv(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata,
const unsigned char *data, long count)
{
const unsigned char *ptr;
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static long read_local_version(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata, char *bts_scr_name)
return 0;
}
-void skip_change_remote_baud(unsigned char **ptr, long *len)
+static void skip_change_remote_baud(unsigned char **ptr, long *len)
{
unsigned char *nxt_action, *cur_action;
cur_action = *ptr;
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static const struct file_operations list_debugfs_fops = {
* board-*.c file
*/
-struct dentry *kim_debugfs_dir;
+static struct dentry *kim_debugfs_dir;
static int kim_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
long status;
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int kim_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-int kim_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
+static int kim_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
{
struct ti_st_plat_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int kim_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-int kim_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int kim_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ti_st_plat_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
diff --git a/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h b/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
index 3ca0269..932b763 100644
--- a/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
+++ b/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
@@ -281,9 +281,10 @@ struct kim_data_s {
long st_kim_start(void *);
long st_kim_stop(void *);
-void st_kim_recv(void *, const unsigned char *, long count);
void st_kim_complete(void *);
void kim_st_list_protocols(struct st_data_s *, void *);
+void st_kim_recv(void *, const unsigned char *, long);
+
/*
* BTS headers
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists