[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501C3F2B.7080004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:14:19 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 7/7] net,9p: use new hashtable implementation
On 08/03/2012 08:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 16:23 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> /* initialize hash table */
>> - for (bucket = 0; bucket < ERRHASHSZ; bucket++)
>> - INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&hash_errmap[bucket]);
>> + hash_init(&hash_errmap, ERRHASHSZ);
>
> Why is hash_init() even needed ?
>
> If hash is "DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(...)", its already ready for use !
Indeed it is.
I've removed it, and then decided to put it back since the definition of the hashtable isn't fully cooked yet, and I didn't want to miss this initialization point if it turn out we need to initialize that hashtable afterall.
I will remove it once the hashtable definitions are clear.
The rest of the review comments will be addressed.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists