linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5 V2] x86: mce: Bugfixes, cleanups and a new CMCI poll version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <501c50de151302d0d7@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:29:50 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	bp@...64.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5 V2] x86: mce: Bugfixes, cleanups and a new
 CMCI poll version

I applied this series on top of v3.6-rc1 and took it for
a test drive with a little storm of 20 corrected interrupts.

The series worked ... but the console log was entirely unhelpful
in letting me know what had just happened to my system.  All I saw
was:

mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
    ... several seconds pass ...
CPU 35 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 CMCI:7 CMCI:8 CMCI:9 CMCI:10 CMCI:11
mce_notify_irq: 3 callbacks suppressed
CPU 1 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 39 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 38 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 32 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 37 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 36 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 34 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged

No mention of the storm, no mention that we switched to polling
mode (and so missed some of the reports). Just the cryptic output
as the kernel re-established the CMCI on processors that had been
affected by the storm.

I tried the patch below to log the start/end of the storm. But I
may be doing something wrong with printk_timed_ratelimit() because
I saw two "storm detected" and two "storm subsided" messages.

It would also be nice to avoid all the "CPU 1 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3"
messages.

-Tony

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
index 693bc7d..236f60e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ void mce_intel_hcpu_update(unsigned long cpu)
 
 unsigned long mce_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
 {
+	static unsigned long jiffie_state;
+
 	if (interval < CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL)
 		return interval;
 
@@ -108,6 +110,8 @@ unsigned long mce_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval)
 		 */
 		if (!atomic_read(&cmci_storm_on_cpus)) {
 			__this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_NONE);
+			if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&jiffie_state, CMCI_STORM_INTERVAL/HZ*1000))
+				pr_notice("CMCI storm subsided, switching to interrupt mode\n");
 			cmci_reenable();
 			cmci_recheck();
 		}
@@ -126,6 +130,7 @@ static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
 	unsigned int cnt = __this_cpu_read(cmci_storm_cnt);
 	unsigned long ts = __this_cpu_read(cmci_time_stamp);
 	unsigned long now = jiffies;
+	static unsigned long jiffie_state;
 
 	if (__this_cpu_read(cmci_storm_state) != CMCI_STORM_NONE)
 		return true;
@@ -145,6 +150,9 @@ static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
 	__this_cpu_write(cmci_storm_state, CMCI_STORM_ACTIVE);
 	atomic_inc(&cmci_storm_on_cpus);
 	mce_timer_kick(CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL);
+
+	if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&jiffie_state, CMCI_STORM_INTERVAL/HZ*1000))
+		pr_notice("CMCI storm detected, switching to poll mode\n");
 	return true;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/