[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120804051608.GB6728@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 07:16:08 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@...com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Vimarsh Zutshi <vimarsh.zutshi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: add option to print cpu id
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:46:15AM -0700, Pandita, Vikram wrote:
> I mostly work with ARM Soc - specifically on OMAP. SMP multi core
> systems in ARM-v7 world started to show up only few years back -
> unlike x86 world.
This is exactly the thing: other SMP vendors have made it so far without
emitting which core is doing what in dmesg.
> ARM systems are a bit unique when it comes to security( read trust
> zone ), and handling of FIQ's. Most of the ARM cortex-A series SoC's
> out there have some kind of affinity to CPU0 being the master. One use
> case has been, it has helped to know with this printk logging, if such
> constraints are honored.
>
> Sometimes, tracking of some lockup cases between cpu's because of bad
> code has also been helpful with this logging support. For now i will
> post v3 of the patch and add arm-list and linux-omap list, and there
> might be users there can benefit.
Right, so if arm people need this thing, why not make it arm-only? I
still fail to see the need for this (... at all, actually).
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists